改良椎板截骨回植与传统椎板截骨回植治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎不稳的疗效比较
摘要点击次数: 195   全文下载次数: 0   投稿时间:2017-10-25  修订日期:2018-08-01  
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
段大鹏 DUAN Da-peng 陕西省人民医院骨科病院 Orthopedic hospital of Shaanxi People's Hospital dapeng_d@163.com 
卫文博 WEI Wen-bo 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
孙正明 SUN Zheng-ming 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
徐洪海* XU Hong-hai 陕西省人民医院骨科病院 Orthopedic hospital of Shaanxi People's Hospital honghaixu@yeah.net 
刘宗智 LIU Zong-zhi 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
弓立群 GONG Li-qun 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
常彦海 CHANG Yan-hai 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
李全义 LI Quan-yi 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
马战胜 MA Zhan-sheng 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
刘时璋 LIU Shi-zhang 陕西省人民医院骨科病院  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》年,第卷,第期,第-页
DOI:
基金项目:陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(编号2015KTCL03-02)
中文摘要:目的:评价改良椎板截骨回植与传统椎板截骨回植治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎不稳的临床疗效。方法:对2008年3月-2013年3月收治的146例单侧腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎失稳患者的临床资料进行前瞻性研究。根据截骨回植方式不同分为传统椎板截骨回植组(传统组)77例,改良椎板截骨回植组(改良组)69例。分析手术时间、术中出血量、术中神经及硬膜囊损伤率、椎板愈合率及术后腰腿痛复发率;采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及日本骨科协会(JOA)评分评价两组方法治疗椎间盘突出症合并不稳的临床效果。重复测量数据采用广义估计方程进行分析。结果:两组患者在手术时间、术中出血量上的差异无统计学意义。改良组神经损伤率和硬膜囊损伤率(分别为5.8%和1.45%)与传统组(分别为16.9%和9.09%)相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);另一方面,改良组3年腰痛复发率(8.7%)显著低于传统组(29.9%),而椎间融合率(91.3%)高于传统组(76.62%)。广义估计方程分析术后VAS及JOA评分随时间变化的趋势变化差异。结果显示,改良组VAS评分小于传统组(β= –0.175,95%CI:–0.263,–0.102;P=0.034),而JOA评分大于传统组(β= 0.113,95%CI:0.072,0.191;P=0.017),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且改良组术后VAS评分下降程度大于传统组(β= –0.116,95%CI:–0.210,–0.093;P=0.000),而JOA评分上升程度大于传统组(β= 0.235,95%CI:0.031,0.438;P=0.024)。结论:改良椎板截骨回植在改善腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎不稳的长期疗效(3年腰痛复发率、椎间融合率、VAS评分及JOA评分)方面优于目前传统椎板截骨回植术。
【关键词】腰椎  椎间盘移位  椎板  回植  广义估计方程
 
Efficacy evaluation of modified lamina osteotomy replantation versus traditional lamina osteotomy replantation in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability
ABSTRACT  Objective:To evaluate the clinical effects of modified lamina osteotomy replantation versus traditional lamina osteotomy replantation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability. Methods: From March 2008 to March 2013, 146 patients with unilateral lumbar disc herniation with lumbar instability who need to undergo surgery were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups according to osteotomy replantation pattern. There were 77 cases in the traditional group (underwent traditional lamina osteotomy replantation), and 69 cases in the modified group (underwent modified lamina osteotomy replantation). The operation time, blood loss, and complication rate during operation, lamina healing rate, low back and leg pain recurrence rate at three years following operation were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scales(VAS) and Japanese Orthopadic Association (JOA) were recorded。Repeated measures were analyzed by generalized estimated equation (GEE). Results:The operation time and blood loss were similar between two group (P>0.05). There was significantly different in nerve injury rate (5.8% vs. 16.9%) and dural injury rate (1.45% vs. 9.09%) between modified group and traditional group. What is more, significant difference were also found in the recurrent rate of low back pain and intervertebral fusion rate at three year between the two group. GEE analysis showed that modified group exhibited lower VAS score (β= –0.175, 95%CI: –0.263, –0.102; P=0.034), while higher JOA score (β= 0.113, 95%CI: 0.072, 0.191; P=0.017) than traditional group. What is more, the extent of VAS score decreased was higher than traditional group, while the extent of JOA score increased was higher than traditional group. Conclusion: Modified lamina osteotomy replantation has better long-term efficacy (recurrent rate of low back pain, intervertebral fusion rate, VAS and JOA score at three years follow-up) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with instability.
KEY WORDS  Lumbar vertebrae  Intervertebral disk displacement  Lamina  Replantation  Generalized estimated equation
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:
英文格式:
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号