铍针治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛 |
摘要点击次数: 108
全文下载次数: 0
投稿时间:2018-03-30 修订日期:2018-03-30
|
|
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》年,第卷,第期,第-页 |
DOI: |
基金项目:国家自然科学(编号:30973817);国家中医药管理局中医临床诊疗技术整理与研究项目(编号:2002ZL40) |
|
中文摘要:目的:探索治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛的安全有效的方法。方法:自2003年1月至2004年12月选取皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛患者278例,分为铍针组和电刺激组。铍针组138例,男68例,女70例;年龄20~60岁,平均(41.92±10.88)岁;电刺激组140例,男68例,女72例;年龄18~60岁,平均(41.44±10.47)岁。治疗前后测量两组患者的疼痛、压痛,以及软组织张力情况,通过对比评价两种治疗方法的临床效果。结果:两组均未出现中止、剔除、脱落病例。治疗后铍针组疼痛评分由8.78±1.52下降为1.33±1.33,电刺激组由8.59±1.76下降为5.20±2.64,且治疗后铍针组疼痛评分低于电刺激组。治疗后铍针组压痛评分由9.12±1.24下降为1.60±1.36,电刺激组由8.79±1.60下降为5.34±2.60,且治疗后铍针组压痛评分低于电刺激组。两组患者张力评分治疗前后差异均无统计学意义,且两组间比较差异亦无统计学意义。结论:铍针治疗组疼痛、压痛的改善优于经皮电刺激刺激。 |
【关键词】铍针 皮神经卡压 腰痛 病例对照研究 |
|
Pi needle is used to treat the cutaneous nerve entrapment low back pain |
|
ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Objective: To explore a safe and effective method for the treatment of pain in the cutaneous nerve. Methods: the therapeutic effect of two methods: Pi needle and percutaneous electrical stimulation was studied. Results: there were 278 cases, 138 cases of group A (Pi needle group), 140 cases of group B (electrical stimulation group), and all of the selected cases were qualified. No suspension, culling and shedding cases occurred in either group. After Wilcoxon rank and test, the overall efficacy of the two groups was compared, with significant difference, P<0.01. Group A showed 72 cases, effective 60 cases and invalid 6 cases. Group B showed 13 cases, effective 36 cases, and invalid 91 cases. Group A is superior to group B. Conclusion: the treatment group of Pi needle was better than the percutaneous stimulation group from the improvement of pain, tenderness and soft tissue tension. |
KEY WORDS Pi needle Cutaneous nerve entrapment Lumbago |
|
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献: |
|
阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|