三根克氏针不同固定方式治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的病例对照研究
摘要点击次数: 2287   全文下载次数: 1316   投稿时间:2011-03-26    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
廖家新 LIAO Jia-xin 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China  
王建伟 WANG Jian-wei 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China ljx_75@yahoo.com.cn 
张爱国 ZHANG Ai-guo 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China  
蔡建平 CAI Jian-ping 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China  
严松鹤 YAN Song-he 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China  
朱国华 ZHU Guo-hua 无锡市中医医院 南京中医药大学附属无锡医院骨科,江苏 无锡 214000 Department of Orthopaedics,Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年,第24卷,第8期,第625-628页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.08.002
基金项目:无锡市医院管理中心医学科技发展基金资助面上项目(编号:YGZ1020)
中文摘要:

目的: 通过对三根克氏针不同固定方式治疗肱骨髁上骨折疗效的比较,寻找最佳的固定方式.

方法: 2008 年7月至2009年5月采用闭合复位经皮克氏针3种不同固定方法治疗60例肱骨髁上骨折.方法1:通过冠突窝桡侧缘固定,共20例,男11 例,女9例;年龄2~13岁,平均(5.4±0.5)岁;均为闭合新鲜骨折,均无神经及血管损伤;GartlandⅡ型13例,GartlandⅢ型7例.方法2:通过冠突窝尺侧缘固定,共20例,男13 例,女7例;年龄2~11岁,平均(6.1±0.4)岁;均为闭合新鲜骨折;GartlandⅡ型11例,GartlandⅢ型9例;术前有尺神经损伤2例,均无血管损伤.方法3:通过冠突窝中间固定,共20例,男8例,女12例;年龄3~14岁,平均(7.4±0.6)岁;均为闭合新鲜骨折,桡神经损伤2例,均无血管损伤;GartlandⅡ型7例,GartlandⅢ型13例.术后1年时,在X线片测量Carrying角及Baumann角,并观测此时的肘关节伸屈情况.按Flynn临床功能评定标准对患肘关节功能进行评价,比较3种方法的疗效.

结果: 肘关节伸屈功能丢失情况:方法1为(14.04±3.25)°,方法2为(13.14±2.34)°,方法3为(9.25±2.56)°.Carrying角改变值:方法1为(7.64±1.78)°,方法2为(7.38±1.68)°,方法3为(5.27±1.13)°.Baumann角改变值:方法1为(28.55±3.23)°,方法2为(27.55±2.23)°,方法3为(21.45±1.73)°.Flynn临床功能评定

结果: 方法1优11 例,良4 例,差5 例;方法2 优12 例,良3 例,差5 例;方法3优11例,良6 例,差3 例.方法3固定治疗效果优于其他两种方法.

结论: 克氏针不同固定方式治疗肱骨髁上骨折的疗效也不同,通过冠突窝中间的治疗方法优于其他方法.
【关键词】肱骨骨折  骨折固定术,内  肘关节  病例对照研究
 
Case-control study on therapeutic effects of different fixation methods with three Kirschners wires for the treatment of humeral supracondylar fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To compare therapeutic effects of three fixation methods with three Kirschner wires,and to find the best fixation method.

Methods: From July 2008 to May 2009,60 patients with humeral supracondylar fractures were treated. Among patients in Group A,11 patients were male and 9 patients were female,ranging from 2 to 13 years old,with an average of(5.4±0.5)years;all the patients in Group A were fresh closed fractures without nerve and blood vessel injuries,13 patients were type Ⅱ and 7 patients were type Ⅲ according to Gartland classification;and all the patients in Group A were treated by three Kirschner wires fixation with the third Kirschner different wire fixed through radial edge of coronoid fossa. Among patients in Group B,13 patients were male and 7 patients were female,ranging from 2 to 11 years old,with an average of (6.1±0.4)years;all the patients in Group B were fresh closed fractures without blood vessel injuries,11 patients were type Ⅱ and 9 patients were type Ⅲ according to Gartland classification,2 patients had ulnar nerve injuries before treatment;and all the patients in Group B were treated by three Kirschner wires fixation with the third Kirschner different wire fixed through ulnar edge of coronoid fossa. Among patients in Group C,8 patients were male and 12 patients were female,ranging from 3 to 14 years old,with an average of (7.4±0.6)years;all the patients in Group C were closed fresh fractures without blood vessel injuries,7 patients were type Ⅱ and 13 patients were type Ⅲ according to Gartland classification,2 patients had radial nerve injuries before treatment;and all the patients in Group C were treated by three Kirschner wires fixation with the third Kirschner different wire fixed through middle of coronoid fossa. After 1 year of treatment,the Carrying and Baumann angles were measured on the X-ray of all patients in the three groups,and the motion range of elbow joint was observed. The Flynn evaluation criteria were used to compare therapeutic effects among the three groups.

Results: All the patients were followed up. The function loss of elbow joint were(14.04±3.25)°in Group A,(13.14±2.34)° in Group B,and (9.25±2.56)° in Group C. Changes of Carrying angle were(7.64±1.78)° in Group A;(7.38±1.68)° in Group B,and (5.27±1.13)° in Group C. Changes of Baumann angle were(28.55±3.23)° in Group A,(27.55±2.23)° in Group B,(21.45±1.73)° in Group C. According to Flynn criteria,there were 11 patients got excellent result,4 good and 5 poor in Group A;in Group B,12 patients got excellent result,3 good and 5 poor;in Group C,11 patients got excellent result,6 good and 3 poor. The therapeutic effects of Group C was better than those of Group A and Group B.

Conclusion: There are different effects among three kinds of operative approaches for the humerus supracondylar fractures. The fixation method with one Kirschner wire through middle part of coronoid fossa is better than the other two fixation methods.
KEY WORDS  Humeral fractures  Fracture fixation,internal  Elbow joint  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:廖家新,王建伟,张爱国,蔡建平,严松鹤,朱国华.三根克氏针不同固定方式治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(8):625~628
英文格式:LIAO Jia-xin,WANG Jian-wei,ZHANG Ai-guo,CAI Jian-ping,YAN Song-he,ZHU Guo-hua.Case-control study on therapeutic effects of different fixation methods with three Kirschners wires for the treatment of humeral supracondylar fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(8):625~628
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号