铍针治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛的病例对照研究
摘要点击次数: 95   全文下载次数: 71   投稿时间:2018-03-28    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
董福慧 DONG Fu-hui 中国中医科学院望京医院, 北京 100102 Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing 100102, China fuhuidong@263.net 
雷仲民 LEI Zhong-min 北京中医医院, 北京 100010  
杨海韵 YANG Hai-yun 佛山市中医院, 广东 佛山 528000  
孙捷 SUN Jie 台州博爱医院, 浙江 台州 318050  
陈力劣 CHEN Li-lue 北京朝阳门医院, 北京 100010  
杨中兴 YANG Zhong-xing 山东禹城颈肩腰腿痛研究所, 山东 禹城 251200  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2018年,第31卷,第6期,第510-513页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.06.005
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:30973817);国家中医药管理局中医临床诊疗技术整理与研究项目(编号:2002ZL40)
中文摘要:

目的:探索治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛的安全有效的方法,明确铍针治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛的指征。

方法:自2003年1月至2004年12月选取皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛患者278例,分为铍针组和电刺激组。铍针组138例,男68例,女70例;年龄20~60(41.92±10.88)岁;电刺激组140例,男68例,女72例;年龄18~60(41.44±10.47)岁。治疗前后测量两组患者的疼痛、压痛,以及软组织张力情况,通过对比评价两种治疗方法的临床效果。

结果:两组均未出现中止、剔除、脱落病例。治疗后铍针组疼痛评分由8.78±1.52下降为1.33±1.33,电刺激组由8.59±1.76下降为5.20±2.64,且治疗后铍针组疼痛评分低于电刺激组。治疗后铍针组压痛评分由9.12±1.24下降为1.60±1.36,电刺激组由8.79±1.60下降为5.34±2.60,且治疗后铍针组压痛评分低于电刺激组。

结论:皮神经卡压综合征在形成明确的痛点、条索、结节时,铍针治疗为首选。
【关键词】铍针  皮神经卡压  腰痛  病例对照研究
 
Case-control study on Pi needle for the treatment of the cutaneous nerve entrapment low back pain
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To explore a safe and effective method for the treatment of low back pain in the cutaneous nerve,and to clarify the indication of Pi needle to treat it.

Methods: From January 2003 to December 2004,278 patients with cutaneous nerve entrapment low back pain were divided into two groups:Pi needle group and electrical stimulation group. In the Pi needle group,there were 68 males and 70 females,ranging in age from 20 to 60 years old,with an average of(41.92±10.88)years old. In the electrical stimulation group,there were 68 males and 72 females,ranging in age from 18 to 60 years old,with an average of(41.44±10.47) years old. The pain,tenderness and soft tissue tension of the two groups were measured and compared before and after treatment.

Results: All of the selected cases were qualified. No suspension,culling and shedding cases occurred in either group. In Pi needle group,visual analog scale(VAS) of pain decreased from 8.78±1.52 before treatment to 1.33±1.33 after treatment;and in electrical stimulation group,VASof pain decreased from 8.59±1.76 before treatment to 5.20±2.64 after treatment;and the VAS of pain of the Pi needle group was lower than that of the electrical stimulation group. In Pi needle group,VAS of tenderness decreased from 9.12±1.24 before treatment to 1.60±1.36 after treatment;and in electrical stimulation group,VAS of pain decreased from 8.79±1.60 before treatment to 5.34±2.60 after treatment;and the VAS of pain of the Pi needle group was lower than that of the electrical stimulation group.

Conclusion: Once tissue texture changes to pain point,cord,nodules,Pi needle is the first line treatment for the cutaneous nerve entrapment low back pain.
KEY WORDS  Pi needle  Cutaneous nerve entrapment  Low back pain  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:董福慧,雷仲民,杨海韵,孙捷,陈力劣,杨中兴.铍针治疗皮神经卡压性腰臀部疼痛的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(6):510~513
英文格式:DONG Fu-hui,LEI Zhong-min,YANG Hai-yun,SUN Jie,CHEN Li-lue,YANG Zhong-xing.Case-control study on Pi needle for the treatment of the cutaneous nerve entrapment low back pain[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2018,31(6):510~513
查看  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备06016590号  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com