双钢板固定治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折
摘要点击次数: 1025   全文下载次数: 402   投稿时间:2021-12-15    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
瞿杭波 QU Hang-bo 浙江医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310030 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, China  
杨自荣 YANG Zi-rong 平湖市第一人民医院骨科, 浙江 平湖 314200 Department of Orthopaedics, the No.1 People's Hospital of Pinghu, Pinghu 314200, Zhejiang, China  
闫应朝 YAN Ying-zhao 浙江医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310030 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, China yingzhaoyan99@163.com 
竺军高 ZHU Jun-gao 浙江医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310030 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, China  
茹选良 RU Xuan-liang 浙江医院骨科, 浙江 杭州 310030 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年,第36卷,第2期,第103-109页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.02.002
基金项目:浙江医院医药卫生科学研究基金(编号:2020KYA005);浙江省中医药科学研究基金项目(编号:2020ZA001)
中文摘要:

目的:探讨前内侧联合外侧锁定钢板治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的疗效。

方法:2018年6月至2020年10月,分别采用前内侧联合外侧锁定钢板(anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate,ALLP)及单纯肱骨近端锁定钢板(proximal humerus locking plates,PHLP)治疗各15例Neer 3、4部分肱骨近端骨折患者。其中男8例,女22例;年龄51~78(61.5±7.5)岁。分为ALLP组和PHLP组。比较两组患者的临床资料与术后简明肩关节功能评分(simple shoulder test,SST)、肱骨头高度丢失值、内翻角及肩关节活动度。

结果:所有骨折获骨性愈合。随访时间12~24(14.3±2.9)个月。ALLP组手术时间较PHLP组长(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1、3、12个月两组SST评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像学测量方面,术后1、3个月,两组肱骨头高度丢失值及内翻角差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后12个月时,ALLP组的肱骨头高度丢失值和内翻角均小于PHLP组;肩关节活动度方面,术后1年ALLP组前屈上举范围较PHLP组大(P<0.05);两组体侧外旋比较差异无统计学意义。

结论:前内侧联合外侧锁定钢板治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折可增加内侧柱稳定性,获得良好的骨折预后。但也存在手术时间较长等缺点,故应根据患者骨折类型个性化选择。
【关键词】内侧支撑  锁定钢板  肱骨近端骨折
 
Clinical study of double plate system in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly
ABSTRACT  

Objective To explore the clinical outcomes of anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate for complex proximal humeral fractures in the eldery.

Methods From June 2018 to October 2020,30 patients who underwent surgical treatment for Neer grade 3 to 4 proximal humeral fractures,including 8 males and 22 females,aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of (61.5±7.5) years old.Of them,15 patients had fractures fixed with anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate (ALLP group),whereas 15 received internal fixation with proximal humerus locking plate only (PHLP group).The clinical data,simple shoulder test (SST),humeral head height loss,varus angle and shoulder range of motion were compared between the two groups.

Results All fractures were healed.The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 24 months,with an average of (14.3±2.9) months.The operation time of ALLP group was longer than that of PHLP group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in SST score between the two groups at 1,3 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05).In terms of radiographic measurement,there was no significant difference in humeral head height loss and varus angle between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after operation (P>0.05).At 12 months after operation,the height loss and varus angle of humeral head in ALLP group were lower than those in PHLP group (P<0.05).In shoulder range of motion,the range of forward elevation in ALLP group was larger than that in PHLP group 1 year after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in external rotation between the two groups.

Conclusion Anteromedial combined with lateral locking plate in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can increase the stability of the medial column and obtain a good fracture prognosis.But there are also disadvantages such as longer operation time,so it should be individualized according to the fracture type of the patient.
KEY WORDS  Medial support  Locking plate  Proximal humeral fracture
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:瞿杭波,杨自荣,闫应朝,竺军高,茹选良.双钢板固定治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(2):103~109
英文格式:QU Hang-bo,YANG Zi-rong,YAN Ying-zhao,ZHU Jun-gao,RU Xuan-liang.Clinical study of double plate system in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(2):103~109
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号