肩肘弹力带固定结合练功疗法治疗外伤性肩关节松弛症临床对照试验
摘要点击次数: 2198   全文下载次数: 1225   投稿时间:2008-02-19    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
彭力平 PENG Li-ping 深圳市福田区中医院骨伤科,广东 深圳 518034 The Futian Hospital of TCM of Shenzhen,Shenzhen 518034,Guangdong,China plp001@sina.com 
林松青 LIN Song-qing 深圳市福田区中医院骨伤科,广东 深圳 518034 The Futian Hospital of TCM of Shenzhen,Shenzhen 518034,Guangdong,China  
陈浩雄 CHENG Hao-xiong 深圳市福田区中医院骨伤科,广东 深圳 518034 The Futian Hospital of TCM of Shenzhen,Shenzhen 518034,Guangdong,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2008年,第21卷,第7期,第503-505页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:观察肩肘弹力带外固定结合练功疗法治疗外伤性肩关节松弛症的治疗效果,并与肩肘吊带固定结合练功疗法进行比较。

方法:80例外伤性肩关节松弛症患者随机分为2组(各40例),观察组和对照组。观察组(完成随访38例)男21例,女17例;年龄17~74岁,平均(48.4±21.3)岁;肩峰-肱骨头间距(acromio-humeral interval,AHI)15~38 mm,平均(22.7±10.2) mm;行肩关节肩肘弹力带固定并肩部肌肉锻炼、理疗、按摩、中药治疗。对照组(完成随访37例)男23例,女14例;年龄21~72岁,平均(45.8±23.4)岁;AHI 15~35 mm,平均(19.4±8.1) mm;行肩肘吊带固定并结合练功、理疗、按摩、中药治疗。比较两组的治疗效果。

结果:观察组治愈29例(76.3%),好转7例(18.4%),未愈2例(5.3%);对照组治愈15例(40.5%),好转15例(40.5%),未愈7例(19.0%).两组疗效的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).观察组AHI 平均(11.9±5.1) mm(8~19 mm),对照组平均(14.2±5.4) mm(8~27 mm),两组差异有统计学意义(t=2.752 5,P<0.01).

结论:肩肘弹力带固定并加强肩周肌肉锻炼,是治疗外伤性肩关节松弛症的安全、有效方法,疗效优于肩肘吊带固定。
【关键词】肩关节  创伤和损伤  外固定器  针刺疗法  中药疗法  临床对照试验
 
A controlled clinical trial on the therapy of injured shoulder arthrochalasis by shoulder-elbow elastic band immobilization with functional exercise
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To observe the therapeutic effects of shoulder-elbow elastic immobilization and functional exercise for injured shoulder arthrochalasis,and compare it with forearm-suspending immobilization and functional exercise therapy.

Methods: The patients with injured shoulder arthrochalasis were randomly divided into treatment group (38 cases) and control group(37 cases). Treatment group underwent the therapy of shoulder-elbow elastic band immobilization and functional exercise;control group was managed by forearm-suspending band immobilization and functional exercise therapy.

Results: In treatment group,29(76.3%)cases recovered,7(18.4%)improved and 2(5.3%)failed;in control group,15(40.5%)cases recovered,15(40.5%)cases improved and 7(19.0%)failed. The differences between two groups were statistically significant(P<0.01). The AHI(acromio-humeral interval) ranged from 8 to19 mm(11.9±5.1)in treatment group and 8 to 27 mm(14.2±5.4)in control group,and the difference was also statistically distinct(t=2.752 5,P<0.01).

Conclusion: The treatment with shoulder-elbow elastic band immobilization and exercise therapy for injured shoulder arthrochalasis is a safe and effective method. Immobilization with shoulder-elbow elastic band is better than forearm-suspending band for injured shoulder arthrochalasis.
KEY WORDS  Shoulder joint  Wounds and injuries  External fixators  Acupuncture therapy  Treatment with Chinese herbs  Controlled clinical trials
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:彭力平,林松青,陈浩雄.肩肘弹力带固定结合练功疗法治疗外伤性肩关节松弛症临床对照试验[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(7):503~505
英文格式:PENG Li-ping,LIN Song-qing,CHENG Hao-xiong.A controlled clinical trial on the therapy of injured shoulder arthrochalasis by shoulder-elbow elastic band immobilization with functional exercise[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2008,21(7):503~505
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号